This blog is based on references in the Bible to fear. God wills that we “BE NOT AFRAID”. Vincit qui se vincit" is a Latin phrase meaning "He conquers who conquers himself." Many theologians state that the eighth deadly sin is fear. It is fear and its natural animal reaction to fight or flight that is the root cause of our failings to create a Kingdom of God on earth. This blog is dedicated to Mary the Mother of God. "
1. Video Summary (U.S. Grace Force – Jesse Romero)
The video emphasizes that every person faces daily demonic pressure, not just the rare cases of possession. The battle is ordinary, subtle, and moral: temptations, discouragement, lies, and spiritual fatigue. Romero stresses that the devil’s ordinary work is to disrupt prayer, distort identity, weaken virtue, and isolate the soul. The proper response is not fear or fascination with the dramatic, but living in a state of grace, frequent Confession, sacramental life, disciplined prayer, and moral clarity. The battle is real, but Christ’s authority is greater.
2. CCC Grounding: What the Church Actually Teaches About Evil
The Catechism gives a sober, disciplined framework:
Evil is real but limited — Satan is a creature; his power is not equal to God (CCC 395).
The ordinary battle is moral — temptation, deception, and the disordering of the human heart (CCC 2846–2849).
Christ has already conquered — the Christian fights from victory, not toward it (CCC 2853).
Grace strengthens the will — the virtues, especially fortitude and prudence, order the soul against evil (CCC 1808, 1830–1832).
The sacraments are the Church’s weapons — Eucharist, Confession, and prayer anchor the soul in divine life (CCC 1436, 2014).
Spiritual warfare is primarily interior — conversion, truth, and fidelity are the battleground (CCC 1428, 1783–1785).
The CCC refuses sensationalism. It insists on clarity, sobriety, and confidence in Christ.
3. Confronting Evil: The Catholic Lens
When you integrate the video’s message with the Catechism, the pattern is unmistakable:
Evil is confronted by truth, not drama. The devil traffics in lies; the Christian confronts him by naming reality as God names it.
Evil is confronted by obedience. The disorder of sin is undone by the order of God’s commandments.
Evil is confronted by grace. A soul in the state of grace is beyond the devil’s dominion; this is the Church’s quiet confidence.
Evil is confronted by perseverance. The daily, unglamorous fidelity to prayer, virtue, and repentance is the real battleground.
Evil is confronted by courage. Fortitude orders fear and prevents panic, outrage, or spiritual theatrics.
Evil is confronted by communion. Isolation is the devil’s terrain; the Church fights as a body, not as scattered individuals.
The CCC’s message is simple and masculine: stand your ground, stay in grace, live the truth, and refuse to be moved.
Wed, May 13 – The Dawn of Fatima Virtue:Docility to Heaven Cigar:Connecticut Shade — pale, gentle, dawn‑colored Bourbon:Weller Special Reserve — soft, unobtrusive, quietly restorative Reflection:“Whose care do I finally allow?”
The Devotion
May 13 is the day Heaven stepped quietly into the world’s sickroom.
Not with thunder.
Not with spectacle.
Not with force.
But with the same gentleness
as the girl in white who entered Hugette’s chamber at dawn—
modest, calm, and carrying the authority of Heaven
in the simplicity of her service.
Fatima is this same movement of God:
a visitation that asks permission,
a grace that does not intrude,
a mercy that heals by presence rather than pressure.
The world, like Hugette, had been wounded
by its own physicians—
bled by its own cleverness,
reduced by its own pride,
left pale and fading on the bed.
And then Heaven entered the room.
A question was asked:
“Will you accept My care?”
Fatima is not primarily a warning.
It is a nursing.
A tending.
A restoration offered to a dying age.
The girl in white tended the fire,
lifted the broken body,
and healed with a touch that was more mercy than miracle.
So too at Fatima:
Heaven bends low,
serves quietly,
and restores what the world has nearly destroyed.
This day asks:
Where have I refused the care Heaven is offering? Where have I insisted on healing myself?
The Virgin does not shame the wounded.
She simply enters the room at dawn
and begins to serve.
Her presence is the cure.
Pray today:
“Mother, teach me the humility
to accept the care Heaven offers.”
The Purgatory Line
A soul in Purgatory once confessed:
“I suffer here because I refused the help
that God sent me.”
Not rebellion.
Not scandal.
Not dramatic sin.
Refusal of grace.
Refusal of care.
Refusal of Heaven’s gentle intervention.
The soul brightened each night
as Blessed Stephen prayed—
its features lifting,
its clarity returning,
its wounds healing
under the mercy it once resisted.
The lesson is exact:
Purgatory is often the long undoing
of every place we insisted on doing it ourselves.
Heaven offers care.
The proud decline it.
The humble are healed by it.
Fatima is the same mercy:
a visitation meant to spare the world
the fire it would otherwise choose.
The Cigar & Bourbon
Connecticut Shade — pale, gentle.
A wrapper like the garment of the girl in white,
soft but decisive,
quiet but healing.
Weller Special Reserve — soft, unobtrusive.
A bourbon that restores without demanding attention,
the way Heaven restores without spectacle.
Together they form a discipline of docility—
the willingness to be cared for
by a Love that enters quietly at dawn.
The Question for the Night Smoke
“Whose care do I finally allow?”
Not:
“What can I fix?”
but
“What healing have I refused
because I wanted to stay in control?”
Let the smoke rise like a prayer
for every place in your life
where Heaven is already standing at the bedside,
waiting for you to say yes.
This is the last statement of Jonathan to
David where he openly acknowledges that David will be king. Jonathan does not
live to see David made king. Jonathan’s visit strengthens David and attests to
the hidden care of the Lord for him. During this time David is in his
wilderness strongholds.
Q: There are
those who say that David and Jonathan had a homosexual relationship to justify
the modern homosexual agenda.
Father Edart[1]:
The account in 1 Samuel 18:1-5 shows gestures and words that express a profound
attachment between Jonathan and David. Although the terms used describe a real
affective bond, their usual use in the Old Testament in no way allows for
seeing a homosexual relationship there. For an example you can see Jacob and
his son Benjamin in Genesis 44:30-31. The expression "to love as
oneself" — as his soul — is frequent — Leviticus 19:18.34. The verb
"to love," in a context of alliance, takes on a political dimension,
the beneficiary being considered as partner or superior. Moreover, the gift
that Jonathan made to David of his weapons illustrates the transfer of his
prerogatives, among which was the right of succession to his father's throne.
It's a political gesture. In the account, nonetheless, David ends up replacing
Jonathan — 1 Samuel 23:17. Other passages, developed by Innocent Himbaza in our
book, illustrate the friendship between Jonathan and David. All the gestures
posed between these two men, however, can take place between parents and
children — Jacob and Benjamin; between brothers — Joseph and his brothers;
between father-in-law and son-in-law — Jethro and Moses; between close friends
— Jonathan and David; between warriors — Saul and David, Jonathan and David;
and between brothers and sisters in the faith — Paul and the Ephesians. We risk
interpreting the latter asked here, but these are actually normal and usual
gestures for people who feel close to one another. We can affirm that nothing
in the texts we are faced with allows for seeing any homosexuality between
David and Jonathan, not even implicitly. If at times an expression is ambiguous
for a modern spirit, reading it in context removes that possibility.
Q: The
Church preaches love of neighbor but is often reproached for wanting to put
"barriers" to love, for not understanding every person's profound
need to love. If the Church does not approve homosexuality, what message of
hope can she give to a person who finds in homosexuality the means to give
himself and to love?
Father Edart: The suffering of a homosexual
person can be very great and not accessible to people who do not experience
this situation. Indeed, our whole world is marked by this fundamental fact of
heterosexual love. Even the Chinese civilization, hardly susceptible to having
been shaped by Judeo-Christian culture, also lives this reality. In that
civilization, homosexuality is also perceived as outside the norm. The
homosexual person experiences an internal suffering, attested by psychological
studies, but he also suffers from his confrontation with a world that very
often will judge and condemn him. This rejection will often even be violent. In
fact, everybody passes a phase in their psychological development of ambiguity
on the sexual plane in adolescence. A person might be, for some time, attracted
by persons of the same sex, without being for all that a homosexual! If this
stage of growth is badly lived or unfinished, it results in psychic suffering.
Subsequently, every confrontation with homosexuality will trigger this
suffering, which will be translated in violent behavior. To learn to consider a
homosexual person without reducing him to his sexual orientation can be
difficult and lead to recognizing one's personal poverty. In the face of this
situation, the Church, in fidelity to the Bible, recognizing that active
homosexuality cannot be a good for the person, forcefully affirms, in the same
fidelity to the word of God, that every person, regardless of his sexual
orientation, has the same dignity and in no way must be the object of unjust
discrimination. As every baptized person, homosexual persons are called to
holiness and to live here and now a living relationship with Christ in the
Church. The message of the Gospel is a source of hope for these persons and the
Church witnesses to this. Christian communities can be places where people see
their personal suffering accepted and understood. The latter will then be able,
with the support of these communities, to seek to correspond to God's call. The
development of friendly and fraternal relations lived in chastity is an
important place of psychological and spiritual healing. Friendship with Christ
is certainly the principal support and guide on this path. He is the best of
friends. This friendship is nourished in the life of faith, prayer and the
sacraments. The homosexual person desirous of progressing toward Christ will
find an indispensable support there. He wants to be in alliance with each one
by meeting the person just as he is and to conduct him to himself gradually
with the continuous and unconditional support of his mercy. It's a long and
difficult but possible path. It is certain that the development of
homosexuality in our Western society is an appeal to Christians to create new
places to help those who are wounded in their sexuality.
C.S. Lewis once wisely observed: “When everyone is rushing
headlong towards the precipice, anyone going in the opposite direction would
appear to be mad.” In July of 1968, the world at large thought Pope Paul VI had
lost his mind. For in that month, he issued his long-awaited encyclical Humanae
Vitae (July 25, 1968), which reiterated the Church’s age-old ban on every form
of contraception. A tidal wave of angry dissent erupted over the pope’s
decision. Catholic and non-Catholic alike berated “the celibate old man in the
Vatican” for hindering the Church’s full entry into the modern era. As we
approach the fortieth anniversary of that historic document, I wish to
emphasize its importance for our times.
As a backdrop for my remarks, I would like to place it in the context of
its time. In the same year that Pope Paul issued Humanae Vitae, another
Paul—Paul Ehrlich— published a book entitled, The Population Bomb. In that 1968
bestseller, Ehrlich made some stark predictions. For example:
“The battle to feed humanity is over. In the 1970s the world will undergo famines
…hundreds of millions of people (including Americans) are going to starve to
death…”
Fact: Food production worldwide is well ahead
of population growth, and obesity now kills 300,000 Americans a year.
“India couldn’t possibly feed two hundred million more people
by 1980.”
Fact: Since 1968 India has doubled its
population by half a billion and is still self-sufficient in food.
Comparing population explosion to a cancerous tumor, Ehrlich
prescribed “cutting out the cancer [too many people]” as the only remedy to
save humanity.
Fact: Today Europe is dying, with most
countries fluctuating around the 60% replacement level.
Against this foreboding background, the reaction to Pope
Paul’s encyclical came as no surprise, even though it only restated what the
Church has taught for 2,000 years. Namely:
“There is an inseparable link between the two meanings of the
marriage act: the unitive meaning [making love] and the procreative meaning
[making babies]. This connection was
established by God himself, and man is not permitted to break it on his own
initiative.” (H.V, no. 12) In
Deuteronomy 18:21 we learn how to tell an authentic prophet from a false one:
Has the prophecy materialized or not? Judged by that benchmark, Paul Ehrlich is
a false prophet. What about Paul VI?
Pope Paul predicted four dire consequences if the use of
contraception escalated:
1) increased marital infidelity.
2) a general lowering of morality, especially among the
young.
3) husbands viewing their wives as mere sex objects; and
4) governments forcing massive birth control programs on
their people.
Forty years later the moral landscape is strewn with the
following stark reality:
1) The divorce rate has more than tripled.
2) Sexually transmitted diseases have increased
from six to fifty.
3) Pornography, especially on the Internet—is a
plague, addicting millions annually.
4) Sterilization is forced on women in third
world countries, with China’s one-child policy in the vanguard.
In the waning years of his life,
St. Augustine wrote his mammoth work, The City of God. According to Augustine,
the whole world is comprised of two communities: The City of God and the City
of Man. Citizens of each city are determined not by one’s birthplace or
residence, but rather by the object of one’s love: placing the love of God
above self, or the love of self above God. The two cities are still with us.
Paul Ehrlich and Paul VI could well serve as icons of each city. In one case,
death and darkness prevail—in the other, life and light. Death or life? The
choice is ours!
The
Transmission of Human Life Is a Most Serious Role[3]
Married people must collaborate freely and responsibly
with God the Creator. It has always been a source of great joy to them, even
though it sometimes entails many difficulties and hardships. The fulfillment of
this duty has always posed problems to the conscience of married people, but
the recent course of human society and the concomitant changes have provoked
new questions. The Church cannot ignore these questions, for they concern
matters intimately connected with the life and happiness of human beings. The
changes that have taken place are of considerable importance and varied in
nature. In the first place there is the rapid increase in population which has
made many fear that world population is going to grow faster than available
resources, with the consequence that many families and developing countries
would be faced with greater hardships. This can easily induce public
authorities to be tempted to take even harsher measures to avert this danger.
There is also the fact that not only working and housing conditions, but the
greater demands made both in the economic and educational field pose a living
situation in which it is frequently difficult these days to provide properly
for a large family. Also
noteworthy is a new understanding of the dignity of woman and her place in
society, of the value of conjugal love in marriage and the relationship of
conjugal acts to this love. But the most remarkable development of all is to be
seen in man's stupendous progress in the domination and rational organization of
the forces of nature to the point that he is endeavoring to extend this control
over every aspect of his own life—over his body, over his mind and emotions,
over his social life, and even over the laws that regulate the transmission of
life.
Unlawful Birth Control Methods
We
base Our words on the first principles of a human and Christian doctrine of
marriage when We are obliged once more to declare that the direct interruption
of the generative process already begun and, above all, all direct abortion,
even for therapeutic reasons, are to be absolutely excluded as lawful means of
regulating the number of children. Equally to be condemned, as the magisterium
of the Church has affirmed on many occasions, is direct sterilization, whether
of the man or of the woman, whether permanent or temporary.
Similarly
excluded is any action which either before, at the moment of, or after sexual
intercourse, is specifically intended to prevent procreation—whether as an end
or as a means.
Neither is it
valid to argue, as a justification for sexual intercourse which is deliberately
contraceptive, that a lesser evil is to be preferred to a greater one, or that
such intercourse would merge with procreative acts of past and future to form a
single entity, and so be qualified by exactly the same moral goodness as these.
Though it is true that sometimes it is lawful to tolerate a lesser moral evil
in order to avoid a greater evil or in order to promote a greater good,"
it is never lawful, even for the gravest reasons, to do evil that good may come
of it—in other words, to intend directly something which of its very nature
contradicts the moral order, and which must therefore be judged unworthy of
man, even though the intention is to protect or promote the welfare of an
individual, of a family or of society in general. Consequently, it is a serious
error to think that a whole married life of otherwise normal relations can
justify sexual intercourse which is deliberately contraceptive and so intrinsically
wrong!
Copilot’s Take
Jonathan’s
final words to David — “Have no fear… you shall be king of Israel and I
shall be second to you” — set the tone for a reflection on confronting evil
in any age. Standing inside a kingdom unraveling around him, Jonathan refuses
to let fear distort what God has already revealed. His loyalty strengthens
David and reveals the hidden care of the Lord. In a culture that manipulates
language to justify its desires, this moment exposes the first battleground:
the defense of truth against distortion. Modern attempts to recast the
David–Jonathan relationship as homosexual are a prime example of this distortion,
and as Father Edart notes, nothing in the biblical text supports such a
reading. Confronting evil begins with the courage to resist the age’s pressure
to rewrite Scripture according to its own appetites.
The Church’s
teaching on persons with same‑sex attraction reveals a second battleground:
compassion without capitulation. The dignity of every person is affirmed
without surrendering the truth about the human person and the moral order. The
world demands affirmation; Christ calls for conversion. The world reduces the
person to his impulses; the Church insists on his capacity for holiness. Evil
thrives when Christians choose cruelty in the name of orthodoxy or compromise
in the name of mercy. The harder path — the Christian path — is to love the
person while refusing to bless the wound. This is the terrain where charity and
truth must stand together.
A third
battleground emerges in the modern revolt against life itself. The contrast
between Paul Ehrlich’s Population Bomb and Paul VI’s Humanae Vitae
illustrates the clash between the City of Man and the City of God. Ehrlich
predicted famine, collapse, and the need to “cut out the cancer” of human
beings. Yet the demographic winter now gripping Europe reveals the deeper
crisis: not too many people, but too little hope. Paul VI warned that
widespread contraception would unleash infidelity, moral collapse, objectification,
and coercive population control — predictions that have unfolded with sobering
accuracy. Evil often disguises itself as progress, but its fruits expose its
true nature.
A fourth
battleground is the illusion of control. Modern society seeks mastery over
every dimension of life — the body, emotions, social structures, and even the
laws governing the transmission of life. This is the ancient temptation of
Eden, now armed with technology. The desire to dominate fertility, erase sexual
difference, or sever love from life is not liberation but rebellion. The
Church’s prohibitions against contraception, abortion, and sterilization are
not arbitrary restrictions but protections against the dehumanizing logic of
self‑creation. Confronting evil requires recovering the humility to receive the
human person as gift rather than project.
A fifth
battleground is the virtue of fortitude — the willingness to stand against the
age. C.S. Lewis observed that the one walking away from the cliff appears mad
to the crowd rushing toward it. Jonathan stood with David when the kingdom was
collapsing. Paul VI stood with the tradition when the world mocked him. The
Church stands with the dignity of the human person when the culture demands
surrender. Confronting evil requires naming lies without fear, defending life
when it is inconvenient, and trusting God’s design when the world insists it
can design itself.
The final
battleground is hope. The choice between the City of Man and the City of God
remains the defining decision of every age: death or life. Evil is loud, but it
is not lasting. The witness of Jonathan, the Church’s teaching on chastity, the
prophetic clarity of Humanae Vitae, and the defense of human dignity all
testify that God continues to write the story. The City of Man exhausts itself;
the City of God endures. In this confidence, the Christian confronts evil not
with despair but with the steady courage of one who knows that light has
already overcome the darkness.
All Saints’ Day
was originally on May 13 in Rome, but the feast day was transferred to November
1, right at the time of harvest to provide food for the pilgrims traveling to
Rome.
May 13 is the anniversary
of the apparition of Our Lady to three shepherd children in the small village
of Fatima in Portugal in 1917. She appeared six times to Lucia, 9, and
her cousins Francisco, 8, and his sister Jacinta, 6, between May 13, 1917, and
October 13, 1917. The story of Fatima begins in 1916, when, against the
backdrop of the First World War which had introduced Europe to the most
horrific and powerful forms of warfare yet seen, and a year before the
Communist revolution would plunge Russia and later Eastern Europe into six
decades of oppression under militant atheistic governments, a resplendent
figure appeared to the three children who were in the field tending the family
sheep.
“I am the Angel of Peace,”
said the figure, who appeared to them two more times that year exhorting them
to accept the sufferings that the Lord allowed them to undergo as an act of
reparation for the sins which offend Him, and to pray constantly for the conversion
of sinners.
Then, on the 13th day of
the month of Our Lady, May 1917, an apparition of ‘a woman all in white, more
brilliant than the sun’ presented itself to the three children saying “Please
don’t be afraid of me, I’m not going to harm you.” Lucia asked her where she
came from and she responded, “I come from Heaven.” The woman wore a
white mantle edged with gold and held a rosary in her hand. The woman asked
them to pray and devote themselves to the Holy Trinity and to “say the Rosary
every day, to bring peace to the world and an end to the war.”
She also revealed that the
children would suffer, especially from the unbelief of their friends and
families, and that the two younger children, Francisco and Jacinta would be
taken to Heaven very soon, but Lucia would live longer in order to spread her message
and devotion to the Immaculate Heart.
In the last apparition the
woman revealed her name in response to Lucia’s question: “I am the Lady of the
Rosary.” That same day, 70,000 people had turned out to witness the apparition,
following a promise by the woman that she would show the people that the
apparitions were true. They saw the sun make three circles and move around the
sky in an incredible zigzag movement in a manner which left no doubt in their
minds about the veracity of the apparitions. By 1930 the Bishop had
approved of the apparitions and they have been approved by the Church as
authentic. The messages Our Lady imparted during the apparitions to the
children concerned the violent trials that would afflict the world by means of
war, starvation, and the persecution of the Church and the Holy Father in the
twentieth century if the world did not make reparation for sins. She exhorted
the Church to pray and offer sacrifices to God in order that peace may come
upon the world, and that the trials may be averted.
Our Lady of Fatima
revealed three prophetic “secrets,” the first two of which were revealed
earlier and refer to the vision of hell and the souls languishing there, the
request for an ardent devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the prediction
of the Second World War, and finally the prediction of the immense damage that
Russia would do to humanity by abandoning the Christian faith and embracing
Communist totalitarianism.
The third “secret” was not
revealed until the year 2000 and referred to the persecutions that humanity
would undergo in the last century: “The good will be martyred; the Holy Father
will have much to suffer; various nations will be annihilated'”. The
suffering of the popes of the 20th century has been interpreted to include the
assassination attempt on Pope John Paul II in 1981, which took place on May 13,
the 64th anniversary of the apparitions. The Holy Father attributed his escape
from certain death to the intervention of Our Lady: “... it was a mother's hand
that guided the bullet's path and in his throes the Pope halted at the
threshold of death.” What is the central meaning of the message of Fatima?
Nothing different from
what the Church has always taught: it is, as Cardinal Ratzinger, the former
Pope Benedict the XVI, has put it, “the exhortation to prayer as the path of
“salvation for souls” and, likewise, the summons to penance and conversion.”
Perhaps the most well-known utterance of the apparition of Our Lady at Fatima
was her confident declaration that “My Immaculate Heart will triumph”.
Cardinal Ratzinger has interpreted this utterance as follows: “The Heart open
to God, purified by contemplation of God, is stronger than guns and weapons of
every kind. The fiat of Mary, the word of her heart, has changed the history of
the world, because it brought the Savior into the world—because, thanks to her
Yes, God could become man in our world and remains so for all time. The Evil
One has power in this world, as we see and experience continually; he has power
because our freedom continually lets itself be led away from God. But since God
himself took a human heart and has thus steered human freedom towards what is
good, the freedom to choose evil no longer has the last word. From that time
forth, the word that prevails is this: “In the world you will have tribulation
but take heart; I have overcome the world” (Jn 16:33). The message of Fatima
invites us to trust in this promise.
Today would be a good day to reflect on what we want
to harvest this fall; so, like farmers we must till the soil of our soul
reflecting this day on our use of our TREASURE (yes money/tithe) and look at in
what ways we may offer our money to Christ to help build a harvest for His
Kingdom. It has been said that money is the root of all evil. Yet, this is not
exactly true for the real root of all evil is not money but the LOVE of money.
Those who fear the Lord know that money is a gift from God. It is not to
be buried but sown. This is the correction that God wishes us to accept. We are
all sowers, and we are to spread the seeds or gifts that God gives us out.
Does God need a tithe
from us? Or Does God need our hearts free from the love of money?
Do not make my house a marketplace. For love of money
or the lust for money is what corrupts men not the money itself.
We
all have causes that we care about, problems we want to see erased from
society, and issues that have affected us deeply throughout our lives. However,
most people are busy and haven’t had the time or opportunity to dedicate as
much as they would want to charities and the causes of their choice. Donate A
Day’s Wages to Charity Day is there to change that. Whether you have trouble
keeping up with charitable donations and you want to make a difference or you
believe that you should make a pledge that matters once a year, it’s the day to
do it.
At this tense moment in our
history, when external wars and internal violence make us so conscious of
death, an affirmation of the sanctity of human life by renewed attention to the
family is imperative. Let society always be on the side of life. Let it never
dictate, directly or indirectly, recourse to the prevention of life or to its
destruction in any of its phases; neither let it require as a condition of
economic assistance that any family yield conscientious determination of the
number of its children to the decision of persons or agencies outside the
family. Stepped-up pressures for moral and legal acceptance of directly
procured abortion make necessary pointed reference to this threat to the right
to life. Reverence for life demands freedom from direct interruption of life
once it is conceived. Conception initiates a process whose purpose is the
realization of human personality. A human person, nothing more and nothing
less, is always at issue once conception has taken place. We expressly repudiate
any contradictory suggestion as contrary to Judeo-Christian traditions inspired
by love for life, and Anglo-Saxon legal traditions protective of life and the
person. Abortion brings to an end with irreversible finality both the existence
and the destiny of the developing human person.
·Conscious
of the inviolability of life, the Second Vatican Council teaches: God, the Lord
of life, has conferred on man the surpassing ministry of safeguarding life, a
ministry which must be fulfilled in a manner that is worthy of man. Therefore,
from the moment of its conception life must be guarded with the greatest care
while abortion and infanticide are unspeakable crimes (Gaudium et Spes, 51).
·The
judgment of the Church on the evil of terminating life derives from the
Christian awareness that men are not the masters but the ministers of life.
Hence, the Council declares: Whatever is opposed to life itself, such as any
type of murder, genocide, abortion, euthanasia, or willful self-destruction,
whatever violates the integrity of the human person...all these things and
others of their like are infamies indeed. They poison human society, but they
do more harm to those who practice them than those who suffer from the injury.
Moreover, they are a supreme dishonor to the Creator" (Gaudium et Spes,
27)
Fairness is a word that means physical beauty. In a sense
God is asking us to not do those things that mar the physical beauty of
another. This means is essence that we need to nourish each other and to give
to share with other the gifts we receive from God. This means to respect each
person as a person, physically, mentally, and emotionally; to provide for their
welfare. One of the greatest ways we can honor our creator is in how we deal
fairly with ourselves, our families, our friends, and those who we detest or
are our enemies.
Christ gave us the ultimate example of fairness:
Then
Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, they know not what they do.” They
divided his garments by casting lots. (Luke 23:34)
Traditional Jews give at
least ten percent of their income to charity.
·Traditional
Jewish homes commonly have a pushke, a box for collecting coins for the poor,
and coins are routinely placed in the box. Jewish youths are continually going
from door to door collecting for various worthy causes.
·A
standard mourner's prayer includes a statement that the mourner will make a
donation to charity in memory of the deceased.
·In
many ways, charitable donation has taken the place of animal sacrifice in
Jewish life: giving to charity is an almost instinctive Jewish response to
express thanks to G-d, to ask forgiveness from G-d, or to request a favor from
G-d.
·According
to Jewish tradition, the spiritual benefit of giving to the poor is so great
that a beggar actually does the giver a favor by giving a person the
opportunity to perform tzedakah.
The Meaning of the Word
"Tzedakah"
"Tzedakah" is
the Hebrew word for the acts that we call "charity" in English:
giving aid, assistance and money to the poor and needy or to other worthy
causes.
·The
nature of tzedakah is very different from the idea of charity. The word
"charity" suggests benevolence and generosity, a magnanimous act by
the wealthy and powerful for the benefit of the poor and needy.
·The
word "tzedakah" is derived from the Hebrew root Tzadei-Dalet-Qof,
meaning righteousness, justice or fairness.
·In
Judaism, giving to the poor is not viewed as a generous, magnanimous act; it is
simply an act of justice and righteousness, the performance of a duty, giving
the poor their due.
The Obligation of Tzedakah
Giving to the poor is an
obligation in Judaism, a duty that cannot be forsaken even by those who are
themselves in need.
·Tzedakah
is the highest of all commandments, equal to all of them combined, and that a
person who does not perform tzedakah is equivalent to an idol worshipper.
·This
is probably hyperbole, but it illustrates the importance of tzedakah in Jewish
thought.
·Tzedakah
is one of the three acts that gain us forgiveness from our sins.
·The
High Holiday liturgy repeatedly states that G-d has inscribed a judgment
against all who have sinned, but teshuvah (repentance), tefilah (prayer) and
tzedakah can alleviate the decree. See Days
of Awe.
·According
to Jewish law, we are required to give one-tenth of our income to the poor.
·This
is generally interpreted as one-tenth of our net income after payment of taxes.
·Taxes
themselves do not fulfill our obligation to give tzedakah, even though a
significant portion of tax revenues in America and many other countries are
used to provide for the poor and needy.
·Those
who are dependent on public assistance or living on the edge of subsistence may
give less, but must still give to the
extent they are able; however, no person should give so much that he would
become a public burden.
·The
obligation to perform tzedakah can be fulfilled by giving money to the poor, to
health care institutions, to synagogues or to educational institutions.
·It
can also be fulfilled by supporting your children beyond the age when you are
legally required to, or supporting your parents in their old age.
·The
obligation includes giving to both Jews and gentiles; contrary to popular
belief, Jews do not just "take care of our own." Quite the contrary,
a study reported in the Jewish Journal indicated that Jewish "mega-donors" (who
give more than $10 million a year to charity) found that only 6% of their
mega-dollars went to specifically Jewish causes.
·Judaism
acknowledges that many people who ask for charity have no genuine need. In
fact, the Talmud suggests that this is a good thing: if all people who asked
for charity were in genuine need, we would be subject to punishment (from G-d)
for refusing anyone who asked.
·The
existence of frauds diminishes our liability for failing to give to all who
ask, because we have some legitimate basis for doubting the beggar's sincerity.
·It
is permissible to investigate the legitimacy of a charity before donating to
it.
·We
have an obligation to avoid becoming in need of tzedakah.
·A
person should take any work that is
available, even if he thinks it is beneath his dignity, to avoid becoming a
public charge.
·However,
if a person is truly in need and has no way to obtain money on his own, he
should not feel embarrassed to accept tzedakah.
·No
person should feel too proud to take money from others.
·It
is considered a transgression to refuse tzedakah. One source says that to make
yourself suffer by refusing to accept tzedakah is equivalent to shedding your
own blood.
Levels of Tzedakah
Certain kinds of tzedakah
are considered more meritorious than others. The Talmud describes these different levels
of tzedakah, and Rambam organized them into a list. The
levels of charity, from the least meritorious to the most meritorious, are:
Giving begrudgingly
Giving less than you should
but giving it cheerfully.
Giving after being asked
Giving before being asked
Giving when you do not know
the recipient's identity, but the recipient knows your identity.
Giving when you know the
recipient's identity, but the recipient doesn't know your identity.
Giving when neither party
knows the other's identity.
ENABLING THE RECIPIENT TO
BECOME SELF-RELIANT. (If only this was the goal of our politicians rather
than steal from those who are self-reliant (work) to give to their
supporters).
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Are these words just words highlighted by men during the
age of enlightenment or are they the inspired will of the creator?
America is special in that the
founders realized this when they wrote our constitution which was established
to ensure that laws are enacted and enforced that support life, liberty and the
pursuit of happiness. Much of our misery in this country is caused by laws that
reverse the order ensuring that wealth trumps liberty and liberty trumps life.
No, it must be life first.
The transmission of human life is a most serious role in
which married people collaborate freely and responsibly with God the Creator.
It has always been a source of great joy to them, even though it sometimes
entails many difficulties and hardships.
The fulfillment of this duty has always posed problems
to the conscience of married people, but the recent course of human society and
the concomitant changes have provoked new questions. The Church cannot ignore
these questions, for they concern matters intimately connected with the life
and happiness of human beings.
The
protection of Life has primacy.
·If we are the children of the creator, we know
that life must be protected at conception to its natural end.
·We must seek the dignity of the unborn, the
living and the aged in our laws and traditions.
When
Americans die, most are buried or cremated. Washington could soon become the
first state to allow another option: human composting. The novel approach,
known as “recomposition,” involves placing bodies in a vessel and hastening
their decomposition into a nutrient-dense soil that can then be returned to
families. The aim is a less expensive way of dealing with human remains that is
better for the environment than burial, which can leach
chemicals into the ground, or cremation, which releases
earth-warming carbon dioxide.
“People
from all over the state who wrote to me are very excited about the prospect of
becoming a tree or having a different alternative for themselves,” said state
Sen. Jamie Pedersen, a Democrat, who is sponsoring a bill in Washington’s
Legislature to expand the options for disposing of human remains. The
recomposition bill would also make Washington the 17th state to allow alkaline
hydrolysis, the dissolving of bodies in a pressurized vessel with water and lye
until just liquid and bone remains. Pedersen plans to introduce the bill when
the new legislative session begins next month.
Well, I guess we
wouldn’t have to depend on Russia for fertilizer
This is scary,
sounds like the movie “Soylent Green” was prophetic. Maybe if you are over fifty you need to stay healthy
as possible for as long as you can.
Bible in a
year Day 312 Conclusion
to the Old Testament
Fr Mike celebrates the accomplishment of reading the entire Old
Testament and wraps up the books of 2 Maccabees and Wisdom, talking through the
key themes of the Old Testament visible in the conclusions to these books. He
also discusses the motivation of the Maccabees to defend the temple and
maintain its purity as well as uphold God’s honor. Today’s readings are from 2
Maccabees 15, Wisdom 19, and Proverbs 25:21-23
Third Shift Workers’ Day
Most
people work during the day, which is lucky for them. Third Shift Workers’ Day
celebrates those who lead more nocturnal lives. Do you ever spare a thought for
the nurses, fire-fighters, supermarket shelf-fillers, and all the other brave
people that work the graveyard shift while you sleep soundly in your soft, warm
bed?
They
are the people that
really keep the world turning, yet they might as well be invisible as far as
most of us are concerned. Inhabiting the strange, monochromatic world of
dreams, they keep us safe from harm, make sure our packages are delivered on
time, and see to it that our morning croissant is freshly baked. Now come on
and drink a toast to the health of third shift workers everywhere. Let’s face it, what with the ravages
wreaked on their immune systems from having their body clock messed around so much,
they’ll be
grateful for it!
John Barry, an Irish
Catholic, was the "Father of the American Navy." He has been
forgotten by all but a few historians, but he outranks John Paul Jones and was
the official father of the Continental and U.S. Naval forces. He went to sea at
a young age in Ireland and settled in Philadelphia. In October 1775, John was
given command of the Continental Congress vessel, the Leviathan, and his
commission, the first issued, was dated Dec. 7, 1775. When the war began, John
Barry served in a spectacular manner. If his ship was shot out from under him,
he and his crew battled on land. They were with George Washington at Trenton
and Princeton. At the end of the war, Congress enacted on March 27, 1794, a law
establishing the U.S. Navy. The U. S. Senate issued the appointments of
officers made by George Washington, and John Barry's commission reads:
"Captain of the U.S. Navy...to take rank from the 4th day of June,
1784...registered No. 1." With victory in hand at the end of the
Revolutionary War, Americans in cities, towns and villages chanted a new ditty:
'Irish Commodore'
"There
are gallant hearts whose glory
Columbia
loves to name,
Whose
deeds shall live in story
And
everlasting fame.
But
never yet one braver
Our
starry baner bore,
Then
saucy old Jack Barry,
The
Irish Commodore."
Please
pray for the intentions of my dear friend from my South Pole adventure and the
Godfather of my daughter Claire, the eminent Navy Chief James Grace.
A Southern‑Gothic melodrama where class, desire, and vengeance twist together in a Carolina swamp town that punishes anyone who dares to cross its invisible lines. Directed by King Vidor, the film gives Jennifer Jones one of her fiercest roles—raw, wounded, and uncontainable—while Charlton Heston plays the proud, restless man who wants her body but not her name, and Karl Malden embodies the tragic decency of a man who tries to lift a woman the town refuses to let rise.
1. Production & Historical Setting
Released in 1952 by 20th Century‑Fox, Ruby Gentry stands at the crossroads of:
Southern Gothic fatalism — swamps, storms, decaying aristocracy, and a community that polices class boundaries with religious fervor. Post‑war American anxiety — prosperity on the surface, resentment and inequality underneath. The rise of the “dangerous woman” archetype — not a femme fatale, but a woman whose independence threatens the social order. Charlton Heston’s early persona — masculine pride, ambition, and the inability to love a woman who doesn’t fit the mold. King Vidor’s moral landscapes — where nature mirrors the soul: storms for rage, swamps for secrets, and lightning for judgment.
The world is small:
country roads, hunting cabins, church pews, backwater docks, and the Gentry mansion where wealth cannot buy acceptance.
But the moral terrain is vast—
class cruelty, sexual hypocrisy, vengeance, shame, and the cost of loving someone you’re too proud to claim.
The cultural backdrop:
A rigid Southern caste system masquerading as morality
The humiliation of poverty in a community obsessed with appearances
The post‑war shift in gender roles—women refusing to stay in their assigned place
The American myth of upward mobility colliding with the reality of inherited status
Religion as both refuge and weapon
The film’s power lies in its contrasts:
Jones’s volcanic emotional force, Heston’s masculine pride and confusion, Malden’s wounded gentleness, and a Carolina town that feels like a moral swamp—beautiful, dangerous, and unforgiving.
2. Story Summary
Ruby Corey (Jennifer Jones)
Poor. Beautiful. Wild.
Raised in the swamps, marked by poverty, and judged by a town that loves her beauty but despises her origins.
She has always loved:
Boake Tackman (Charlton Heston)
A once‑wealthy landowner’s son—proud, ambitious, and too class‑bound to marry a girl from the wrong side of the river.
He desires Ruby, but he will not claim her.
When Boake marries a wealthy woman for status, Ruby—humiliated and heartbroken—accepts the proposal of:
Jim Gentry (Karl Malden)
A wealthy, older widower who once sheltered her and genuinely loves her.
Ruby does not love him, but she accepts the safety and dignity he offers.
The town rejects her anyway.
She is too poor for the rich, too proud for the poor, and too beautiful for the women who fear her.
A public confrontation between Jim and Boake ends in violence.
Soon after, Jim dies in a boating accident—
and the whispers begin:
Did Ruby let him drown?
Did she marry for money?
Did she kill for freedom?
Now wealthy and scorned, Ruby turns her inheritance into a weapon.
She calls in debts.
Shuts down businesses.
Crushes the people who humiliated her.
And yet she remains bound to Boake—
a toxic, irresistible bond that pulls them toward a violent, storm‑lit end.
3. Spiritual & Moral Resonances
A. The Wound of Class
Ruby’s suffering is not just personal—it is structural.
The film exposes how communities enforce invisible hierarchies with gossip, religion, and shame.
B. Desire Without Courage
Boake wants Ruby’s fire but not her story.
His failure is not lust—it is cowardice.
C. Vengeance as a False Salvation
Ruby’s revenge is understandable, even righteous,
but it cannot heal the wound of being unwanted.
Vengeance clarifies nothing; it only deepens the swamp.
D. The Tragedy of Misread Strength
Ruby’s independence is interpreted as sin.
Her beauty is treated as a threat.
Her poverty is treated as a stain.
The film reveals how communities punish women who refuse to be small.
E. Judgment Without Mercy
The town’s religiosity is a mask.
Its morality is cruelty dressed as righteousness.
Ruby becomes a symbol of what happens when a woman refuses to bow to a corrupt moral order.
4. Hospitality Pairing — The Carolina Storm Spread
A pour of Wild Turkey 101 — bold, earthy, unrefined, the drink of a woman who refuses to apologize for her strength. A Maduro cigar — dark, humid, swamp‑rich, echoing Ruby’s emotional depth and the film’s Southern heat. Pecan pralines — sweetness with a burn, like Ruby’s love for Boake. A weathered leather journal — the place where a man confronts the pride, desire, and fear he hides from the world.
A setting for nights when you want to reflect on class, desire, and the cost of refusing to stay in your assigned place.
5. Reflection Prompts
Where have I allowed pride or fear to keep me from claiming what I truly love.
What wounds from my past still shape how I see myself today.
Who have I judged based on class, background, or reputation rather than truth.
Where am I tempted to use power or success as a form of revenge.
What part of my story still needs mercy instead of shame.
Posts
